John Leifer recently drew the
attention of the loss of Catholic Health Care in Kansas City[1]
as the last bastions of non-profit hospitalization are being
sold to for-profit organizations, which are concentrating more
and more health institutions into fewer hands. In this
Midwestern city, four Catholic hospitals are being sold out as
they’ve become too expensive to operate for the Sisters of
Charity and Ascension Healthcare.
What Leifer omits to mention is the
loss of religious vocations and therefore of highly competent
sister-nurses who cost the hospitals only food and shelter. Not
all that long ago, Catholic hospitals like
St. Mary’s
in Kansas City were staffed with
women religious.
Leifer, who spent his life working
with hospitals of all types, "rued the day when the spirit of
caring was sacrificed to purely secular care."[2] Writing in
1998, Leifer worried about the direction health care was heading
and issued a challenge to the industry (published by the
American Hospital Association):[3]
Once upon a time, health care was
all about healing. It was driven by compassion, faith, and
science that combined to meet patients' emotional, spiritual,
and physical needs. Hospitals frequently were governed by
clergy who focused on mission, not margin - and who wouldn't
dare think of wearing pinstripe suits. These institutions had
a palpable spirit of caring. The field possessed a gentility
and grace; it was a time when healing was still viewed as a
sacred art.
Today, the industry is moving like a
runaway train on a collision course with the profane. There is
neither the time nor the inclination to indulge the sacred
elements of care. The once-hallowed doctor/patient
relationship has been reduced to mere sound bites exchanged
during hurried office visits, and therapeutic words of empathy
have been replaced with Prozac scrips… Nurses are overworked
and patients are undercared for. The only thing that glistens
in our modern health care system is its dazzling technology.
Of course it shines. Our hospitals
have become altars to the twin gods of technology and science…
The relationship between medicine and science may have
delivered us from untold suffering, but like any Faustian
bargain, it did so at a price. Scientific advances have led to
medical reductionism - a tendency to view the patient as
little more than the sum of physiological processes. This
conviction reduces patients' emotions to mere neurochemical
events and holds that the soul is an illusion, in reality
nothing more than an electrochemical phenomenon. Hence, a
patient is not to be ministered to - a patient's condition
is to be cured.
Thanks to science, cure is the only
option. God forbid we talk about death. It's not natural, or
so the myth goes. After all, death is the failure of science.
Hence, heroic measures are used by providers to sustain
terminally ill patients--often at great cost to patients'
illusory souls. And though the hospice movement has grown
dramatically in the past 30 years, most patients still die in
hospitals as their doctors engage in a pitched battle against
the inevitable.
It's clear that science and
technology have exacted a toll on our psyche and soul in
exchange for a few more minutes of life. Just as important,
they have taken a toll on our pocketbook… Health care has not
always been a trillion-dollar industry representing more than
15 percent of our gross domestic product. Hospitals and
doctors are both to blame for this inflation. Hospital costs
rose from $28 billion in 1970 to $350 billion in 1995, a 1,250
percent increase. Physician services rose from $13.6 billion
to $201 billion, a 1,500 percent increase.
The time has come for a
resurrection. For health care to undergo such a renewal, a
number of things must change, beginning with our definition of
healing. If we remove our scientific blinders, however, and
begin to view patients as having physical, spiritual, and
emotional "bodies," then we're forced to view the art of
healing in a much broader context. Compassion becomes an
essential medicine, and time is allocated for kind words of
encouragement. The modification of our lexicon needs to
include a redefinition of death, making it an accepted part of
the life process. Thirty years ago, Elisabeth Kubler-Ross
sought to teach us that death was not to be feared, but
ultimately to be embraced as the final stage of life. Our goal
as healers is not to prevent death at any cost, but – to
paraphrase Ira Byock – to help the dying to die well… A
person's passing is then marked by dignity, not horrific pain
and nearly insurmountable medical bills.
Fifteen years after this article,
Leifer takes up his pen once again and adds two comments from
Arnold Relman in his book A Second Opinion:
One careful study in 2002 reviewed
all the available published data for U.S. private for-profit
and not-for-profit hospitals, pooled the results, and found
that the risk of patient death was 2 percent higher in the
for-profit hospitals…
An interesting report in 1999
compared Medicare spending in geographic areas in which all
acute-care hospitals were for-profit with spending in areas in
which all the hospitals were not-for-profit. Adjusted mean per
capita Medicare spending on inpatient care, as well as total
spending, was much higher in the for-profit area.
Leifer finishes with a blunt statement
by George Lundgren, editor of the Journal of American
Medicine:
The profession of medicine has been
bought out by business, and unless physicians take it back, it
will devolve into a business technology in which faceless
patients will be treated by faceless technicians.
To these caveats we should add the
recent threats coming from ObamaCare, which attacks all medical
professionals, doctors and nurses, as well as the patients. And,
last but not least, there is also the threat of a successful
legislation on the so-called "Reproductive Health Care Act," in
Governor Cuomo’s New York State which aims to raise abortion to
a "fundamental right." This bill ensures "that
abortion is treated as a matter of women’s health, not as a
matter of criminal law."[4] Brave New World, indeed!
Footnotes
1 "The loss of Catholic health care,"
The Kansas City Star, May 7, 2013.