|
|
|
Fr. Massimo: “This is
why I went over to the SSPX.”
1-24-2011
We reprint
here the text of an article published January 12, 2011, on the
website Corriere del Veneto concerning Fr. Massimo’s
transfer. Also on the site is the complete text of the letters by
the young priest from Vicenza. |
 |
|
TWO
NEWS REPORTS ABOUT FR. MASSIMO'S CASE |
VICENZA—A painful decision, preceded by a series of
tormented thoughts, made even more stressful by the
silence of a remote town like Pedemonte. There, in the
isolation of the Valle dell’Astico, Fr. Massimo
Sbicego, a 38-year-old priest born in Montecchio Maggiore,
who was assigned to lead the local religious community in
September 2009, allowed his decision to ripen over the
past months: to transfer to the traditionalist Society of
St. Pius X, founded by Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre (a great
opponent of the Second Vatican Council, champion of the
Tridentine Mass and enemy of ecumenism, who was
excommunicated in 1988 for having ordained four bishops
[without permission]). Benedict XVI in a way legitimized
the work of the Society by lifting the excommunications on
the bishops consecrated by the founder. And so at the end
of last year Fr. Massimo left the countryside, an
unexpected departure which aroused the curiosity of the
townspeople and even some romantic speculation.
But
now to explain the mystery, here are two letters [by Fr.
Massimo], one written to Msgr. Ludovico Furian, Vicar
General of the Diocese [of Vicenza], and one addressed to
his former parishioners: material which only yesterday was
delivered to the local community, starting with the mayor,
Roberto Carotta. This correspondence is full of
reflections from which emerges also a direct critique of
the modern Church: “For me today it is incredible and
intolerable that the Holy Mass… should be subjected to
review by those who consider it ‘wearisome’,” Fr.
Massimo writes to the head of the Diocese of Vicenza, “that
some feel the need to ‘reflect on how to evaluate its
symbols’ creatively with people who have understood little
or nothing about the life and Sacrifice of Our Lord. On
the other hand I realize that this problem is connected
with the convivial character of the vernacular Mass; if
the supper is not involving, lively, emotional, it is an
unwelcome invitation; there is a risk of devising a
celebration and a Church that are adolescent, aimed at
‘involving’ people rather than ‘sanctifying’ them.”
This critique extends also to catechetical methods and to
the danger of “unconsciously assuming the mentality of
today’s world with its egotism, its lack of a spirit of
sacrifice, of mortification, its denial or ignorance of
the supernatural, and its religious and ethical relativism.”
“The
painful thing is that our catechetical courses promote all
that,” Fr. Massimo writes, “whereas Catholic
doctrine is neglected, not taught, sometimes even
ridiculed so as to emphasize the ‘human dimensions’ that
never get around to the real purpose: developing a mature,
conscious and unconditional choice of the Catholic faith
and way of life.” It was a personal struggle against
the “lukewarm faith” of today’s Church, recounted
in writing yesterday to the lay faithful also, whom Fr.
Massimo claims to have protected precisely by his quiet
departure. Fr. Massimo assures his readers that his was
“a conscientious decision, a search for Truth,
which is Our Lord…. In the Society I found the deep
meaning of the Catholic Priesthood, so much so that I
could venture to say, ‘To many it will seem that I am
leaving the Diocese; in reality, as a Catholic, I am
coming back home.’”
Silvia Maria Dubois |
|
Fr.
Massimo Sbicego, the parish priest from Vicenza who
entered the Society of St. Pius X a few days ago, has
graciously sent us a copy of the letter that he wrote to
his former parishioners, together with a copy of the
correspondence in which he explained his decision to the
chancery officials of the Diocese of Vicenza. Whatever
opinion one may have personally about the priest’s painful
and deliberate decision, I think that his courteous,
respectful tone toward the diocesan authorities and toward
the parishioners themselves is very much appreciated,
especially since it is accompanied by true firmness and
clarity concerning the doctrinal and liturgical questions
that prompted this major step.
Enrico |
|
|
Fr. Massimo’s
Letters |
Departing letter to his parish
January 11,
2011
Dear
Brothers and Sisters in Christ,
It seems to
me appropriate, after the passage of several days, to emerge from
the discreet silence that characterized my departure: above all,
please know that I too was unhappy that I could not greet you
personally to testify to the great respect that I have for you.
My decision
to enter the Priestly Society of St. Pius X and the reasons that
led to it are not something recent; two years ago I already spoke
about it with Archbishop Nosiglia, then Bishop of Vicenza, to
obtain permission to spend a “sabbatical” year at a house of that
institute.
Last month,
in mid-December, I again discussed my decision frankly with
Monsignor Furian; the Diocesan Administrator received me and
listened to me with the utmost kindness, expressing his wish that
I should leave to the diocesan authorities the task of giving
explanations. The same plan was mentioned to me afterward by the
Vicar for rural parishes [Vicario foraneo] as well. The
request seemed reasonable to me, and complying with it seemed to
me to be a sign of good will toward my superiors, whom I intended
to leave free to manage as best they could the situation that
would be created; therefore I went away quietly, in order to avoid
involving you directly in this delicate question of conscience.
That’s all. [Tutto qui; i.e. that is what I
intended, and no more.]
Following
this letter you will find the full text of the letter and the
cover letter that I sent to Monsignor Furian after our personal
conversation in mid-December; these are documents that express not
only my consciousness of an ecclesial [Church-related] situation
but also my personal interior life.
I thank all
those who in these recent days have expressed to me their
sympathy; I greet you with affection and ask the Lord to bless
you.
Fr. Massimo |
|
Last letter to his diocesan administrator, Msgr. Ludovico Furian
Pedemonte,
December 21, 2010
Dear Fr.
Ludovico,
Accept my
heart-felt thanks for your paternal concern during our
conversation on December 14 and for your subsequent letter; in it
I vividly sensed your esteem, understanding and kindness toward
me, which moreover is mutual.
Besides
being a conscientious decision, my choice of the Society of St.
Pius X is based on a search for Truth, which is Our Lord, and on
profound doctrinal convictions which challenged [interrogato]
and sometimes disturbed me for years, to the point of calling into
question the ministry that I had received. In the Society I found
the deep meaning of the Catholic Priesthood, so much so that I
could venture to say, “To many it will seem that I am leaving the
diocese; in reality, as a Catholic, I am coming back home.”
Fr. Massimo |
|
Initial
letter to his diocesan administrator, Msgr. Ludovico Furian |
To Msgr.
Ludovico Furian
Diocesan
Administrator
I write
these few lines to give my reasons for a decision which is a
conscientious choice, made in faith and above all consistent with
Our Lord’s call to the Priesthood and with the priestly ideal.
Often we
priests are asked whether we have had a personal encounter with
Jesus; today I can say, “Yes! I have encountered Him.” I
encountered Him at the foot of a cross that stood over an old
altar, while I offered the Holy and Spotless Victim, for my sins,
for those who were in attendance at that Holy Mass, and for all
Christian believers, living and deceased. I encountered Him
through a liturgical rite, the Mass of all ages, the one which the
Holy Father wants to make known again despite a thousand
obstacles. It signifies much more than an external ceremony: it
really makes present Calvary and the Sacrifice of the Cross in my
hands; in a mysterious yet clear way it causes me to be and to
feel united to Christ, especially through the desire to imitate
Him as a priest, a pastor, and somehow also as a victim, offering
my daily crosses in union with Him.
As I
celebrated the Holy Sacrifice, the Lord Himself reawakened in me a
seed that had been dulled, almost suffocated by inconclusive
pastoral programs and fanciful “anthropological approaches”: the
seed of His call to the Priesthood: “I want you to save souls
through Me,” is the idea that springs from the Holy Sacrifice
of the Mass, the one sacrifice, the Holy Mass of the all times.
For me today it is incredible and intolerable that the Holy Mass,
the living, pulsating heart of Grace in the Church, should be
subjected to review by those who consider it “wearisome”, that
some feel the need to “reflect on how to evaluate its symbols”
creatively with people who have understood little or nothing about
the life and Sacrifice of Our Lord. On the other hand I realize
that this problem is connected with the convivial character of the
Novus Ordo; if the supper is not involving, lively,
emotional, it is an unwelcome invitation; I think that there is a
very real risk of devising a celebration and a Church that are
adolescent, aimed at “involving” people rather than “sanctifying”
them.
One
authoritative voice has spoken about a
“silent apostasy”: the same phenomenon that I
noticed spreading among our children and young people while
teaching them at the middle school and high school levels, meeting
them in the parish rather than on the street; I think that this
comes from unconsciously assuming the mentality of today’s world
with its egotism, its lack of a spirit of sacrifice, of
mortification, its denial or ignorance of the supernatural,
religious and its ethical relativism, etc. The painful thing,
though, is that our catechetical courses, parish groups, and RCIA
promote all that, whereas Catholic doctrine is neglected, not
taught, sometimes even ridiculed so as to emphasize the “human
dimensions” that never get around to the real purpose: developing
a mature, conscious and unconditional choice of the Catholic faith
and way of life.
In this
respect the Tridentine Mass forces us, with the power of Grace and
Tradition, to call into question our lukewarm faith and to
consider a reform of our personal lives, together with a sensible
ecclesiology in which 1) the lay faithful carry on their battle in
the world, at work, in the family, in sports, discovering that the
world does not love them because they belong to Christ and the
Catholic Church; and 2) Priests dedicate themselves to God, in
prayer and in their apostolate, so as to sustain, exhort, and
train the faithful and to give them the sacramental Grace which is
Christ Himself.
Although
waged by peaceful methods, this battle is not irenic, and
certainly not “low-profile”; I think that it is high time for the
Church to have the courage of the Truth, to declare it again
today, because Doctrine is not her property but is rather a
precious Deposit which Christ has given her: the Unicity
[Uniqueness] of Salvation by Our Lord; the sense of a life
directed toward the Four Last Things; the sense of Christ’s
Sacrifice, from which each soul can receive saving Grace; the
sense of a serious commitment, made up of self-denial and charity,
which the Lord will reward at the opportune time; the sense of the
True, Real Presence of Christ in the Sacred Host; the sense of
Hope for all who have been crucified throughout history because
Christ was the first of them and continues to be daily on the
altar; the sense of a Church still capable of teaching youngsters
to kneel down to recite the Holy Rosary; the sense of a Word in
the service of the Holy Sacrifice; a Word illuminated by constant
Tradition rather than delivered up to extemporaneous, ephemeral
interpretations, to the suggestive “magisterium” of the unlikely
exegete of the day, as opposed to the Magisterium of the Church.
All this
reminds me of the passage from St. Paul: “For there shall be a
time when they will not endure sound doctrine but, having itching
ears, they will surround themselves with teachers according to
their own desires, and will indeed turn away their hearing from
the truth, but will turn instead to fables” (II Timothy 3-4). And
how much confusion I can see, how many trivial pursuits [banalita],
how many tall tales [sparate], how many “theologies” in
that text!
Today I am
ready to choose Our Lord, perhaps more than when I was ordained
ten years ago, because I see the story of what He has done with
me; although saddened by so many confreres who, even recently,
have abandoned their ministry, with a bit of nostalgia for the
Diocese which I continue to love and to which I remain deeply
connected, today I choose to continue my consecrated life in a
place where He is present with Truth, Faith, Doctrine, Hope, for a
future of rebuilding the Church: the Priestly Society of St. Pius
X.
I humbly ask
a simple man with a sincere smile, a Bishop of enormous stature,
Bishop Bernard Fellay, to enlist me in the struggle against the
self-destruction of the Church, so that Christ might rise again in
human hearts and societies.
With this
letter therefore I submit my resignation as pastor of the Pastoral
Unit [conglomeration of parishes?] Alta Valdastico as of
noon on December 30, with a promise of my prayers for you,
Monsignor, and asking you to provide pastoral care for those
beloved parishioners. |
As long
as I have remained here I have put my heart into my work and
have tried to hand on a little of the Catholic Faith anyway,
[but] without the Holy Mass of all ages, the Tridentine Mass,
“heaven remains closed and drift is inevitable”
(Michael Davies, Cranmer’s Godly Order).
With
confidence in your respect for a conscientious and distressing
decision and in the close prayer that unites us to the One
Catholic Church, I beg the Lord that “Corpus Domini nostri
Iesu Christi custodiat animam nostram in vitam aeternam”
[the Body of our Lord Jesus Christ might preserve our souls
unto eternal life].
Pedemonte, December 14, 2010 |
|
|
Very truly
yours,
Fr. Massimo
Sbicego |
|
|
|
|
|