|
Archbishop Lefebvre's
public statement against false ecumenism |
Written in October 1983, it was not actually
made public until June 1988 in conjunction with the Episcopal Consecrations.
|
|
Albano
October 19, 1983
We read in the twentieth chapter of Exodus that
God, after having forbidden His people to adore strange gods,
added these words: "It is I who am the Lord thy God, a mighty
and jealous God, visiting the iniquity of fathers on their sons to
the third and fourth generation of those who hate Me." In
chapter thirty-four of Exodus we read: "Thou shalt not adore
any strange god. A jealous God, that is the name of the Lord."
It is just and salutary that God should be
jealous of what belongs to Him alone and from all eternity:
jealous of His infinite eternal almighty being, jealous of His
glory, of His truth, of His charity, jealous of being the only
Creator and Redeemer, and so of being the end of all things, the
sole way of salvation and happiness for all angels and men,
jealous of being the Alpha and the Omega.
The Catholic Church founded by Him and to which
He entrusted all the treasures of salvation is for her part also
jealous of the privileges of her sole Master and Lord, and teaches
all men that they must turn towards her and be baptized by her if
they wish to be saved and partake of the glory of God in a happy
eternity. Thus the Church is essentially missionary. She is
essentially one, holy, Catholic, Apostolic and Roman.
She cannot admit of there being any other true
religion outside of her; she cannot admit that one may find any
way to salvation outside of her since she identifies herself with
her Lord and God who said: "I am the Way, the Truth and the
Life."
Hence she has a horror of any communion or
union with false religions, with heresies, and with errors which
put a distance between souls and her God who is the one and only
God. She knows only unity within her fold, as does her God. For
that she gives the blood of her martyrs, the life of her
missionaries, of her priests, the sacrifice of her religious and
nuns, she offers the daily Sacrifice of Propitiation.
But with Vatican II a spirit of adultery has
been blowing through the Church, a spirit which in the Declaration
on Religious Liberty allows of the principle of religious liberty
of conscience for internal and external acts, with exemption from
any authority. This is the principle of the Declaration of the
Rights of Man against the rights of God. The authorities of the
Church, the State and the Family partake of the authority of God
and hence they have the duty to contribute to the spread of the
Truth and to the application of the Decalogue, and to protect
their subjects against error and immorality.
This Declaration provoked the laicizing of
Catholic States which is an insult to God and to His Church,
reducing the Church to the status of equality with false
religions. This is exactly the spirit of adultery for which the
people of Israel were so often rebuked (see Note 1, the
declaration of Pope Paul VI, L'Osservatore Romano, April
24, 1969). This spirit of adultery is also made clear in the
ecumenism instituted by The Secretariat for the Unity of
Christians. This aberrant ecumenism has brought in its train all
the reforms of the liturgy, of the Bible, of canon law, with the
collegiality that destroys the personal authority of the Supreme
Pontiff, of the episcopacy and of the parish priest (see Note 2).
This spirit is not Catholic; it is the fruit of
the Modernism condemned by St. Pius X. It wrecks all the
institutions of the Church and especially the seminaries and the
clergy, in such a way that one may ask who is still integrally
Catholic among the clerics who submit to this adulterous spirit of
the Council! Hence nothing is so urgent in the Church as to form a
clergy repudiating this adulterous and Modernist spirit and saving
the glory of the Church and her Divine Founder by keeping the
integral Faith and the means established by Our Lord and by the
Tradition of the Church to keep this Faith, and to transmit the
life of grace and the fruits of the Redemption.
It will soon be twenty years now that we have
been striving with patience and firmness to get the Roman
authorities to understand this need for a return to sane doctrine
and Tradition, for a renewal of the Church, for the salvation of
souls and for the glory of God.
To safeguard the Catholic priesthood which
perpetuates the Catholic Church, we need Catholic bishops. We find
ourselves constrained, because of the spirit of Modernism invading
today's clergy, an invasion reaching even to the highest summits
within the Church, to undertake the consecrating of bishops, this
principle having been accepted by the pope...
But a deaf ear is continually turned to our
entreaties - nay, more, we are being asked to recognize the wisdom
of the whole Council and of the reforms ruining the Church. No one
wishes to pay any heed to our present experience of, with the
grace of God, maintaining the Tradition which produces true fruits
of holiness and draws numerous vocations.
To safeguard the Catholic priesthood which
perpetuates the Catholic Church and not an adulterous Church, we
need Catholic bishops. So we find ourselves constrained, because
of the spirit of Modernism invading today's clergy, an invasion
reaching even to the highest summits within the Church, to
undertake the consecrating of bishops, the principle of this
consecration having been accepted by the pope, according to
Cardinal Ratzinger's letter of May 30. These episcopal
consecrations will not only be valid, but given the historical
circumstances, most probably also licit. However, be they licit or
not, it is sometimes necessary to abandon the letter of the law in
order to observe the spirit of the law.
The Pope can only desire the Catholic
priesthood to continue. Hence it is in no way in a spirit of
rupture or schism that we are carrying out these episcopal
consecrations, but in order to come to the help of the Church
which finds herself no doubt in the most sorrowful situation of
her whole history. Had we found ourselves in the times of St.
Francis of Assisi, the pope would have been in agreement with us.
There was not an occupation by Freemasonry of the Vatican in its
happier days.
Hence we declare our attachment and our
submission to the Holy See and to the pope. In accomplishing this
act of consecration we are aware of continuing our service to the
Church and to the papacy exactly as we have striven to do ever
since the first day of our priesthood.
The day when the Vatican will be delivered from
this occupation by Modernists and will come back to the path
followed by the Church down to Vatican II, our new bishops will
put themselves entirely in the hands of our Sovereign Pontiff, to
the point of desisting if he so wishes from the exercise of their
episcopal functions.
Finally we turn towards the Virgin Mary who is
also jealous of the privileges of her Divine Son, jealous of His
glory, of His Kingdom on earth as in heaven. How often has she
intervened for the defense, even the armed defense, of Christendom
against the enemies of the Kingdom of Our Lord! We entreat her to
intervene today to chase the enemies out from inside the Church
who are trying to destroy her more radically than her enemies from
outside. May she deign to keep in the integrity of the Faith, in
the love of the Church, in devotion to the successor of Peter, all
the members of the Society of St. Pius X and all the priests and
faithful who labor alongside the Society, in order that she may
both keep us from schism and preserve us from heresy.
May St. Michael the Archangel inspire us with
his zeal for the glory of God and with his strength to fight
demons.
May St. Pius X share with us a part of his
wisdom, of his learning, of his sanctity, to discern the true from
the false and the good from the evil in these times of confusion
and lies.
† Marcel Lefebvre
P.S. [this post script is from the June 1988
issue of The Angelus magazine when this text was made
public—webmaster] This statement, drawn up in 1983, is
still valid today. It needed only one correction concerning the
agreement with Rome for the consecration of a bishop in the letter
of May 30, 1988. If the conversations of the months of April and
May did not reach a conclusion, that is because they showed the
will of Modernist Rome to make us accept the spirit and reforms of
Vatican II.
Note 1: Declaration of Paul VI,
L'Osservatore Romano, August 24, 1969: "The new position
adopted by the Church with regard to the realities of this earth
is henceforth well known by everyone... and here is the most
important new principle to be put into practice... the Church
agrees to recognize the world as 'self-sufficient,' she does not
seek to make the world an instrument for her religious ends..."
This is a declaration contrary to the Catholic Faith, against
which I protested in a letter to what used to be the Holy Office.
The reply was, coming from the Secretary of State, that is to say
Cardinal Villot, that I should quit Rome immediately; to which I
answered that he would have to send a squad of Swiss guards to
force me to quit Rome. The reply was silence. That is what has
happened to the Vatican and what it still is today with regard to
the defenders of the Catholic Faith. All the popes in their
encyclicals stated the opposite. Not only the Faith, but also sane
philosophy rises up in protest against this declaration which
laicized all the Catholic States.
Note 2: Secretariat for the Unity of Christians
at the Council. It is suitable to recall the important role played
by the members of the Secretariat for the Unity of Christians in
the Council. Cardinal Bea entered into official relations with the
Masonic Jewish Lodge of B'nai B'rith of New York in the United
States. It was Cardinal Bea who drew up the projects for the
schemas on Religious Liberty, on the Jews, on non-Christian
Religions, on ecumenism, in collaboration with Cardinal
Willebrands, Secretary of the Secretariat, and Bishop De Smedt,
Vice-President of the Secretariat and reporter at the Council on
the Declaration on Religious Liberty.
Cardinal Willebrands formed part of the Vatican
Commission for Judeo-Christian relations and of the Commission
which maintains relations with the ecumenical Council of Churches,
and of the Commission which concerns itself with relations with
Moscow through the intermediary of the Orthodox Church of Moscow.
To them are to be joined Cardinal Etchegaray, Msgr. Maller, the
Dominican Fathers de Contenson, Bernard Dupuy, and a number of
others. The influence of the Protestants of Taize is not to be
neglected either, who were able to come and go as they liked in
the Vatican. Nor should we forget the presence of six Protestant
pastors in the Liturgical Commission. The harmfulness of all these
Commissions is considerable. The Commissions are paralyzing all
the normal activity of the Roman Curia. The Rome of the
Commissions is the present active-day Rome, Modernist and Masonic.
Popes Paul VI and John Paul II have wanted these commissions and
have become their slaves just as they are prisoners of the Roman
Synods, fruits of the collegiality recognized by the new Canon
Law. To read the long article in the Dictionary of Catholic
Theology, listed in the index under the title "Ecumenism," and
written by Father Charles Boyer, S.J., who was the Secretary for
the Secretariat for Unity after Cardinal Willebrands, is very
instructive in uncovering the ecumenical spirit presiding over all
the reforms. |
|
|
|
|