You all shared our great hope for the consecration of Russia
by the Pope and the bishops on October 8, and you were all, I am sure, bitterly
disappointed that it was not done. Clearly we have not prayed enough, we have
not sanctified ourselves sufficiently, we have not consecrated ourselves
sufficiently to the Immaculate Heart to win the grace of the consecration of
Russia to the Immaculate Heart, the triumph of the Immaculate Heart and the time
of peace. Not of course that our prayers were useless. They will certainly bring
many graces on those who live united to the Blessed Virgin Mary, and will bring
many souls under her mantle. However, be prepared to bear the evils of these
times of so little Faith.
The Pope in fact performed an "Act of Entrustment
to Mary Most Holy". You who might wonder what this novelty of "entrustment"
is. It is a watered down version of consecration, especially designed not to
offend protestants, who believe that to consecrate ourselves to anybody other
than God is to detract in some way from the worship due to Christ. This is of
course entire nonsense, since Mary’s soul is the purest and most perfectly
consecrated to Almighty God, so that everything and everyone who is offered and
consecrated to her immediately belongs to Her Divine Son. However, this strange,
false ecumenical concern is apparently enough to bypass the requests of the
Mother of God, and to substitute what Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone, Secretary for
the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, defines in this way: "Entrustment
acknowledges our need for help from God and is a plea for Mary’s intercession
for that aid".
Entirely different from this vague sense of our need for
God’s help and for Mary’s prayer, is a consecration. A consecration of
something sets it aside as sacred, cutting it off from everything profane,
ordinary and secular, so that it can belong entirely to God, and become truly
sacred. This is a duty not just for sacred objects such as altars and chalices,
and not just for consecrated persons, such as priests and religious, but for
every baptized soul. As Saint Louis Grignon de Montfort points out, consecration
to the Blessed Virgin Mary (and the same can be said of her Immaculate Heart) is
but the means to live the consecration of our baptism:
"All our perfection consists in being conformed, united and
consecrated to Jesus Christ; and therefore the most perfect of all devotions is,
without any doubt, that which the most perfectly conforms, unites and
consecrates us to Jesus Christ. Now, Mary being the most conformed of all
creatures to Jesus Christ, it follows that of all devotions, that which most
consecrates and conforms the soul to Our Lord is devotion to His holy Mother,
and that the more a soul is consecrated to Mary, the more it is consecrated to
Jesus. Hence it comes to pass that the most perfect consecration to Jesus Christ
is nothing else but a perfect and entire consecration of ourselves to the
Blessed Virgin...or in other words, a perfect renewal of the vows and promises
of holy Baptism." (True Devotion, Part II, I)
How tragic it is that men of the Church would put aside
such a sacred treasure, in the name of secular humanism and of not offending
non-Catholics. Not only was this entrustment not a consecration, but in addition
it did not mention Russia. It was the new millennium that was entrusted, but
without the separation from the spirit of the world that is essential to a
consecration. Here is the most important part of the formula: "To you,
Dawn of Salvation, we commit our journey through the new Millennium, so that
with you as guide all people may know Christ, the light of the world, and its
only Savior, who reigns with the Father and the Holy Spirit for ever and ever.
Amen." It is a good time for us to remember that Russia will only
convert if it is consecrated, separated from the world’s atheistic spirit of
rebellion, and that we will only contribute to the Church as we ought if we are
truly and totally consecrated to Jesus through Mary, as St. Louis Grignon de
Montfort instructs us. Let us renew this consecration for the latter times, or
if we have not yet done it, prepare ourselves for it.
You will recall that last month I commented on the
declaration Dominus Jesus, which declaration has continued to bring about
strong and opposing reactions, on account of the manifest contradictions
inherent in it. A Vatican-sponsored day of Jewish-Christian Dialogue, due to
take place on October 3, was canceled on September 21 when leaders of Rome’s
Jewish community withdrew their participation on account of the publication of
the declaration on "the unicity and salvific universality of Jesus
Christ and the Church". The Geneva-based World Alliance of Reformed
Churches, representing 215 different churches considered calling off its
September 13-19 ecumenical dialogue with Rome and registered the following
formal complaint:
"We have learned with a sense of dismay of the declaration
made by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith this week, and would like
to register this with you in the strongest terms possible. This declaration
seems to go against the spirit of Vatican II, as we understand it,…When
statements in that declaration seem to contradict commitment to ecumenical
cooperation within the Christian family or even take us back to a pre-Vatican II
spirit, we are concerned…"
Note that the concern is about an apparent return to the
Catholic Church’s unchanging teaching that she alone has the truth, thus
making ecumenism impossible. The important point is not that they are wrong, and
that they do not fully understand it as I showed last month, but that they see
that a return to pre-Vatican II ideas is the denial of ecumenism.
The Pope himself responded to these accusations by
personally addressing the dialogue with the World Alliance of Reformed Churches
and maintaining his (and the Church’s, he claims) commitment to ecumenism. It
is in order to achieve unity that, he said: "the commitment of the
Catholic Church to ecumenical dialogue is irrevocable". He here states
very clearly that they did not understand the declaration, and that it did not
really mean what it appeared to them to say, namely the reaffirmation of what
Catholics always believed before Vatican II concerning the Church’s necessity
for salvation, and that consequently it is not a threat to modern day ecumenism.
And to heighten even further the confusion, the Pope himself declared on October
1, in his Angelus address, that he himself approved this declaration, and that
he defends it.
How can he be in such obvious contradiction with himself?
Because the "true" understanding of the text, that simple people seem
to have missed out on, whether they be Protestants, Jews, or traditional
Catholics, is that there is no longer any contradiction between ecumenism
between equals and the Catholic Church’s traditional claim to alone have the
truth and to be necessary for salvation. This is the key to the modernists’
nonsensical attempt to reconcile the Vatican II revolution with Catholic dogma.
There is only one way to explain the fact that the liberal theologians fail to
see the contradiction, and it is that they have changed the meaning of words
such as the Church, such as truth, such as faith, such as unity, such as
salvation. When all these words are understood in a subjectivist sense, it
becomes perfectly possible to discuss them on an equal level, by which "our
dialogue then becomes an examination of conscience, a call to conversion, in
which both sides examine before God their responsibility to do all that they can
to put behind them the conflicts of the past" (John Paul II’s
September 18 address to the World Alliance of Reformed Churches). The fact that
we subjectively believe in our church, our truth, our faith, our unity, our
salvation, is in no way an obstacle to such exchanges. In this way a liberal can
still be an ecumenist and believe in the deepest, most profound subjective
subconsciousness of his soul that for him the Catholic Church is the one
church and for him necessary for salvation, and that it is for him in the
Catholic Church that the church of Jesus Christ subsists. Then all the
contradictions disappear in the "clarity" of subjectivism.
Whilst confronted with this conflict of ideas, this
spiritual confusion, let us keep our heads screwed on tight by the objective and
complete sense of Catholic truth, of the visible Church, outside of which there
is no salvation, of the assurance that the Catholic Faith and visible unity lack
nothing, and are alone the means chosen by God. Let us follow the Blessed Virgin
Mary, Queen of Martyrs and of All Saints to inspire in us her total consecration
to the Most Holy Trinity, that being consecrated to Mary, we might find in her
the objective and sure protection against all the uncertainty and confusion of
the modern world.
Yours faithfully in the Immaculate Heart of Mary,
Fr. Peter R. Scott